1331
post-template-default,single,single-post,postid-1331,single-format-standard,theme-stockholm,qi-blocks-1.2.5,qodef-gutenberg--no-touch,stockholm-core-2.3.3,woocommerce-no-js,qodef-qi--no-touch,qi-addons-for-elementor-1.6.7,select-theme-ver-9.4,ajax_fade,page_not_loaded,,qode_menu_,qode-mobile-logo-set,qode-single-product-thumbs-below,wpb-js-composer js-comp-ver-7.1,vc_responsive,elementor-default,elementor-kit-2858

Ansel Adams, the WSJ and a bowl full of mush

Ansel Adams, the WSJ and a bowl full of mush

This morning while I was enjoying my morning bowl of mush and reading the Wall Street Journal I came across a wonderful article on photography. It had me on the first paragraph:

Ansel Adams, a piano prodigy before he picked up a camera, once declared that the photographic negative was like a musical “score,” while the final print was akin to the concert “performance”.

except from What does Art Look Likeby Richard B. Woodward

This brought me right back to a conversation I was having with a friend about the pros and cons of printing your own work. Yes, printers are a pain in the ass and the ink expensive. Yes, you can send your files out and get a perfectly serviceable image back. But if you want to take your game to the next level there is nothing to compare to making minor and major edits to a print based on seeing a proof come directly out of your own printer.

When the world was only shooting in black and white it was not uncommon to have a dark room in your own house. With the advent of color printing this became unfeasible and most photographers where content to send their film to a lab for printing. Now with excellent inexpensive printers (a relative statement I know) plentiful, it seems a shame to send out what can be done easily in the comfort of your own home.

I’m not usually a control freak, but I find it indispensable to see what my images look like off the screen before I deem them worthy of showing and selling. Light, color, shadows, highlights all look different and once the image is on paper. I will often see corrections that need to be made that I could never have foreseen by looking at a screen.

So call me old school, but I agree with Ansel Adams and feel that to fulfill your potential as an artist you need to print your own work.

In further defense of printing, if I had not enlarged this image myself, I would never have seen the spider climbing on the rock. This is a detail that can only be seen at A2 or larger. In my opinion this small detail makes the image. 

No Comments

Post a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.